Which of the following scenarios would most likely lead to a successful judicial review claim based on \text{substantive legitimate expectation}?
Question 2
In the context of judicial review, what is the primary distinction between an \text{error of law} and an \text{error of fact}?
Question 3
A government minister issues a directive that contradicts a clear provision in an Act of Parliament. Which ground of judicial review would be the most appropriate basis for challenging this directive?
Question 4
Which of the following statements accurately describes the court's approach to reviewing decisions based on \text{Wednesbury unreasonableness}?
Question 5
A claimant seeks to challenge a decision by a public body, but the application is made 6 months after the grounds for the application first arose. What is the likely outcome regarding the procedural requirement for promptness?