Question 1
In evaluating a philosopher's reasoning, what is the first best step before deciding whether the conclusion is convincing?
Question 2
What does it mean to reconstruct an argument from the prescribed text?
Question 3
Which statement best describes a strong evaluation of reasoning in a prescribed text?
Question 4
Why is it important to distinguish between a philosopher's conclusion and the evidence used to support it?
Question 5
Which question is most useful when checking whether a philosopher's reasoning contains a hidden assumption?
